Senator David McCormick (R-Pa.) is positioning himself as a leading voice on artificial intelligence, a technology he describes as the most profound change of our time, yet his approach raises familiar questions about power and privilege.
When 'Useful Arts' Become Crown Prerogative: Senator McCormick's AI Stance Echoes Pre-Revolutionary Economic Control
Senator David McCormick (R-Pa.) is positioning himself as a leading voice on artificial intelligence, a technology he describes as the most profound change of our time, yet his approach raises familiar questions about power and privilege.
Why it matters: The foundational premise for fostering innovation, enshrined in the power "to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing, for a limited time, to authors and inventors, the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries," was for broad public benefit. When legislative figures, tasked with public service, champion unchecked innovation while their personal interests align directly with the industries they promote, the distinction between public good and private prerogative erodes. This dynamic, where the power to shape emergent economic realities resides with the directly invested, is chillingly reminiscent of colonial frustration with royal charters and monopolies benefiting favored British merchants. The Senator's assertion that regulation is 'too soon' for a technology he acknowledges carries profound risks, while simultaneously securing vast public investments for it, evokes a familiar grievance. The American Revolution was, in part, a fight against economic control exerted by powerful, distant interests operating under a façade of benevolent oversight. This modern scenario raises similar questions about self-governance and the right of the populace to oversee its own economic destiny, rather than simply bear the 'trickle down' costs of an unregulated frontier.
Read the Full Story